Re: Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?
Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:30:39 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <404ff18b4cf68eb38d425c23b5755933__44479.7515556731$1250663907$gmane$org@so-news.germany.sun.com> |
Hi Rene, >> We invite everybody porting OOo to another platform to give feedback to >> this project. As rumor has it, boost 1.39 creates problems when used on >> some platforms (either at compile- or runtime), so if your platform is >> know to be one of those, or if you just want to be sure - please give >> the CWS a try. > > Did you need code changes for boost 1.39 to work at either build or > runtime? At compile time - yes. At runtime - no. However, I didn't manage, yet, to do extensive runtime checks of all affected areas. That's ongoing work. > [ Seems so, do you now strictly need 1.39? No, I think 1.34 would do, too. As said, a previous incarnation of the CWS compiles fine with 1.34, but again, I didn't do extensive runtime checks with this version. > Then we probably should adapt the system-boost check in configure; or > we #ifdef it as necessary ] Ah, okay, will put this onto my TODO list (unless you volunteer, of course :) ). Thanks & Ciao Frank