Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

Thorsten Behrens <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.tools
Message-ID <20090819132938.GC2871__10547.458616975$1250688596$gmane$org@thinkpad.thebehrens.net>
[Cc to tinderbox removed]

Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
> As an additional note, it has been suggested to not commit the
> boost*.tar.gz to boost/download, but make it a pre-requisite which needs
> to be downloaded before building. This would (for 1.39) save >50M in the
> repository for every version ever committed there.
> Opinions on this plan are also welcome.
> 
Hi Frank,

hm - in the light of heavy-weight commits like the .sdf one, ain't
this just a micro-optimisation? Unless such stuff gets downloaded
automagically, it's a big nuisance in the already-full-of-nuisances
ooo build experience. 

Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few
other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;)

Just my 2c,

-- Thorsten
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKi/5C0atnB9QI2h8RAvZYAJ9d8iVzrtAXjARm/Dih8KSmbCvWgwCfVsLZ
DjLiUbLAzPgRWgIfTW2yqIE=
=09CZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.