Re: [dev] Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Mercurial-Implementation: OOo domain developer public keys

Hi Christian,

Dne Friday 28 of August 2009 19:40:02 Christian Lohmaier napsal(a):

> >> Suggestions for a coherent nomenclature are welcome!
> >
> > Well, I was thinking the git way once again, sorry :-(
> >
> > But anyway, 'trunk' or 'main repository' (for DEV300), 'feature
> > repository' (for OOO300, OOO310, ...),  and 'release repository' (for
> > CWSes) sound best to me.
>
> Oh, that is the exact opposite of my understanding.
> OK with "main" for DEV300, but the OOO ones are the release ones,
> that's where the releases are based on after all. And new features
> won't be added on those. So calling OOO ones "feature branches" would
> be confusing at best.
> Similar for the cws - you won't buid a release based on a cws branch,
> so thats a misnomer as well.

Of course I meant "...'release repository' (for OOO300, OOO310, ...),  
and 'feature repository' (for CWSes)...", as already stated at the beginning 
of that mail where I wrote "CWS really means a 'feature branch', and 
MWS means a 'release branch'".

Sorry for the confusion :-(

Kendy