Re: requirements for a Windows build bot and cws box

Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Martin Hollmichel wrote:
>   
>>>> Pavel, Thorsten, you may want to comment or approve these
>>>> spendings for the developer budget ?
>>>>         
>>> +1 for the Windows box/server. We desperately need communi Windows
>>> machine. I;d go with terminal services directly from the
>>> beginning.
>>>
>>> -1 for the regular yearly payment for the hosting services. Can we
>>> do it better/cheeper? Can anyone offer/sponsor this service for
>>> us?
>>>       
>> please keep in mind that this yearly payment includes 100MBit and
>> unlimitted traffic, that also will allow the download of builded
>> cws, I think it's worth the price, but I'm open for better or
>> cheaper offers, how long we want to wait for those offers ?
>>
>>     
> +1 for the full package; if someone finds a cheaper offer that's of
> course fine by me. Win32 builds are a pain point for me, and
> historically the dev budget has not been fully spent, so no point in
> haggling too much here.
>
> What about reviewing the hosting options again next year?
>   
there is no minimal duration for the hosting, so we're free to review 
the hosting options at any time.
> Cheers,
>
> -- Thorsten
>   
Martin