Re: Re: Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

Martin Hollmichel wrote:
>
>>  There's also the dmake
>> -> cmake converter script so you don't have to keep writing the files
>> by hand.
>>
>>   
> from what I've learned from cmake so far, it seems the best idea to do 
> an 1:1 conversion since this might lead to too much targets (and thus 
> dependencies) and writing CMakeLists.txt seem in some cases lead to 
> more efficient makefiles.
of course this should read as "it seems _not_ the best idea, to do an 
1:1 conversion",

Martin