Re: [website-dev] Add the "OOo with JRE" checkbox into the green One-Click-Download
Marcus Lange <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:07:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.website |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sun Microsystems GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kay Schenk wrote: Hello Kay, > I'm actually working on this today, so good to know... I've done a cvs update and have seen your 2 files in the test section. So, I thought about to notify you. ;-) > and, by the way, I need to track down who "mla" is...is that you? Yes, (M)arcus (La)nge. > I notice this page... > > http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#tested-full > > uh...has changed quite a bit and now "Download" is substituted in many > cases for the version number. Was this on purpose? "Download" is to indicate the most current version and everything older is named by its version number. This is done since a few 3.x releases. > Also, with the testing I'm doing, if I disable javascript, the checkbox > goes away (well that's OK). > > But I will also point out the instructions just won't work at all if the > chekcbox is NOT available/showing.It is virtually impossible to take out > the "-wJRE" on the fly. At this point, the link has already been > generated. So, maybe these instructions need to be changed? > Or...something else. The checkbox is generated with JavaSript. So, no JS --> no checkbox. But with JS enabled IMHO it should be possible to exchange the link because it's already working on the "other.html" and "all_rc.html" webpages. > But anyway, thanks for the info...this is indeed an interesting problem > to say the least. Yeah, seems to be really tricky. If my knowledge about JS would be better I could be of better help. ;-( Good night. Marcus > On 06/16/2010 01:04 PM, Marcus Lange wrote: >> Hello Kay, >> >> I've added some more exceptions for the JRE checkbox as Linux x86-64 RPM >> and Solaris x86/Sparc is only available with JRE and Linux HPPA, S390X, >> PPC, IA64 and SDK only without JRE. The "index.html" includes the global >> "download.js", therefore it applies also to the test section. >> >> So, when the browser tells, e.g., OS=Solaris, then always a download >> link with wJRE builds should be offered, regardless if the checkbox is >> checked or not. Linux 32/64 Debian always without JRE. And so on. >> >> The label text for the checkbox is updated. >> >> Best regards >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> Kay Schenk wrote: >>> Hi--a quick update on this. >>> >>> I am making progress but NOT QUITE THERE yet! :( >>> >>> This is one of those cart before the horse issues (things changed later >>> in the page but how to propagate them up), and well, some solved but ONE >>> problem still remaining -- a function call to openItem that needs a URL >>> fix. The inline ones I got to mess with through some JS. >>> >>> my test area is at -- >>> http://download.openoffice.org/test/index_k.html >>> >>> more later... >>> >>> On 05/20/2010 04:10 PM, Marcus Lange wrote: >>>> Bernhard Dippold wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Bernhard, >>>> >>>>> Could you divide the light green area in two areas? The upper in >>>>> darker green (like the lower border of the upper area) and only the >>>>> lower in light green. >>>> I don't know if I hit the colors but the areas are now divided. >>>> >>>>> People intending to download directly will notice hover effect only if >>>>> they are over the main download area, while clicking on the >>>>> with/without JRE area will just toggle the checkmark. >>>>> >>>>> This would help to understand the different purposes of the two parts >>>>> actually combined in the light green area. >>>> Yes, the different events/actions need different areas. But, hm, do you >>>> really want to have 3 green areas? OK, here you are. :-) >>>> >>>>> PS: With a smaller window the new text is wrapped sub-optimal IMHO... >>>> Fixed with the checkbox code inside a <p> section. >>>> >>>>> (and the background images for hover are visible below the normal >>>>> ones...) >>>>> If this is not reproducible with your browser and about 800px window >>>>> width (look at RC and dev-OOo downloads), I'll upload a screenshot >>>>> (SeaMonkey 2.0.4, Firefox 3.6.3) >>>> This looks indeed quite ugly. Needs to be fixed (by an CSS expert). >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> >>>> Marcus