[infrastructure-dev] Re: Changes in the OOoWiki backend

Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> Wed, 4 May 2011 05:55:46 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.website
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--00261887757e4f48b204a2711920
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Clayton <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 05/04/2011 12:43 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Clayton <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>    There as been a lot of link spam on the OOoWiki the past few days.
>>      I'm tired of chasing it, and I imagine the other Admins are
>>    too.... so I've added some code to the LocalSettings.php file to
>>    block all edits and page creation to new confirmed accounts.  After
>>    a 4 day "cooling off period" then the new user accounts will have
>>    edit and page creation rights.  Hopefully this is long enough that
>>    the Spammers get bored and leave... but new users come back.
>>
>>    There are very very few new legitimate users compared to spam
>>    accounts anyway... and of those new legitimate users maybe one per
>>    month actually edits a page.  The impact of this change on
>>    legitimate users should be very low.
>>
>>    See:
>>
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Wiki_maintenance/LocalSettings.=
php_modifications#Block_new_users_from_editing_or_creating_new_pages_for_4_=
days
>>    for details of the change.
>>
>>    C.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for looking out clayton, should I try to push my users to create
>> accounts just in case, or should they do the opposite and wait a few
>> days until they create new accounts?
>>
>
> New users can create accounts as usual... it's just that there is a 4 day
> period after confirming their account that they cannot edit pages. There =
are
> no other limitations that I've added... other than the 4 day wait, it's t=
he
> same as before... so don't tell people not to create accounts if they need
> them.
>
> I'm not sure what else we can do here to combat Spam... we've got
> recaptcha, a regex filter for keywords, a bad behavior extension, email
> confitmation, another spam trap extension, and still there is loads of SEO
> link spam.  Lately there has been more spam than legit editing.
>
> If this is too disruptive, I can of course remove the restrictions or
> reduce the wait time.
>
> I'm also open to any other ideas if the community doesn't like this
> solution :-)
>
> C.
>
>
I wonder if we are being targeted or maybe is a big vulnerability found on
mediawiki that is now being exploited internetwide by spammers. Have you
check with the security alerts of mediawiki?

--=20
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Espa=C3=B1ol
http://es.openoffice.org
--=20
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
For additional commands send email to [email protected]
with Subject: help

--00261887757e4f48b204a2711920
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Clayton =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">ccornell@o=
penoffice.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st=
yle=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204)=
; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">On 05/04/2011 12:43 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;=
 border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=
=3D"im">
<br>
<br>
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Clayton &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ccornell@open=
office.org" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a><br></div><div cla=
ss=3D"im">
&lt;mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">cco=
[email protected]</a>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0There as been a lot of link spam on the OOoWiki the past few =
days.<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0I&#39;m tired of chasing it, and I imagine the other A=
dmins are<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0too.... so I&#39;ve added some code to the LocalSettings.php =
file to<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0block all edits and page creation to new confirmed accounts. =
=C2=A0After<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0a 4 day &quot;cooling off period&quot; then the new user acco=
unts will have<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0edit and page creation rights. =C2=A0Hopefully this is long e=
nough that<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0the Spammers get bored and leave... but new users come back.<=
br>
<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0There are very very few new legitimate users compared to spam=
<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0accounts anyway... and of those new legitimate users maybe on=
e per<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0month actually edits a page. =C2=A0The impact of this change =
on<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0legitimate users should be very low.<br>
<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0See:<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Wiki_main=
tenance/LocalSettings.php_modifications#Block_new_users_from_editing_or_cre=
ating_new_pages_for_4_days" target=3D"_blank">http://wiki.services.openoffi=
ce.org/wiki/Wiki_maintenance/LocalSettings.php_modifications#Block_new_user=
s_from_editing_or_creating_new_pages_for_4_days</a><br>

 =C2=A0 =C2=A0for details of the change.<br>
<br>
 =C2=A0 =C2=A0C.<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks for looking out clayton, should I try to push my users to create<br>
accounts just in case, or should they do the opposite and wait a few<br>
days until they create new accounts?<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
New users can create accounts as usual... it&#39;s just that there is a 4 d=
ay period after confirming their account that they cannot edit pages. There=
 are no other limitations that I&#39;ve added... other than the 4 day wait,=
 it&#39;s the same as before... so don&#39;t tell people not to create acco=
unts if they need them.<br>

<br>
I&#39;m not sure what else we can do here to combat Spam... we&#39;ve got r=
ecaptcha, a regex filter for keywords, a bad behavior extension, email conf=
itmation, another spam trap extension, and still there is loads of SEO link=
 spam. =C2=A0Lately there has been more spam than legit editing.<br>

<br>
If this is too disruptive, I can of course remove the restrictions or reduc=
e the wait time.<br>
<br>
I&#39;m also open to any other ideas if the community doesn&#39;t like this=
 solution :-)<br><font color=3D"#888888">
<br>
C.</font><div><div></div><br></div></blockquote><div><br>I wonder if we are=
 being targeted or maybe is a big vulnerability found on mediawiki that is =
now being exploited internetwide by spammers. Have you check with the secur=
ity alerts of mediawiki?<br>
=C2=A0</div></div>-- <br><b>Alexandro Colorado</b><br><b><span style=3D"col=
or: rgb(0, 0, 153);">Open</span><span style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Office=
.org</span></b> Espa=C3=B1ol<br><a href=3D"http://es.openoffice.org" target=
=3D"_blank">http://es.openoffice.org</a><br>
<br>

--00261887757e4f48b204a2711920--