Re: [OOo-Hebrew] Spell checker on Windows
Uri Bruck <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:35:55 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.hebrew |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006, Yitzchak Gale wrote about "Re: [OOo-Hebrew] Spell checker on Windows": > >> Of course, part of the problem is that many wordsdo not have a universally >> accepted "correct"spelling in the sense that people would considerother >> variants as "wrong". There are different styles,and it is not the job of a >> spelling checker to enforceone of them. >> > > I think I don't agree with you on the job of the spell-checker, and I'd like > to solicit opinions on this from other people as well. > I agree with Nadav on this point. > > > Another thing to ponder is why we Israelis have come to accept the situation > that in any other language we know, each word (with very few exceptions) > has one accepted spelling, and in Hebrew, we have one accepted spelling with > niqqud - but when it comes to the way we normally spell - without niqqud - > suddenly there is no "accepted" spelling, even though the Academia, and > recent Hebrew dictionaries, all have a spelling standard. > Many publishers have their own variant of rules for "ktiv maleh." It's very common for an editor to receive "the House ktiv maleh rules" from a publisher when he does his first job for them. So Yitzchak's notion of "common usage vs. Academia" is a misconception. Different publishers deviate from the Academia standard in subtly different ways. Usually minor. The Academia standard is the one that has a linguistic foundation. So one might provide an alternative dictionary according to a specific publisher's standard. I don't think that's as useful as hspell's current policy. Inconsistencies within the same publication are just editing errors. > > If we do this survey by word classes, i.e., make one consistent decision for > all words like âðáä, ùøôä, etc., then we end up exactly with "rules". This > is what the Academia did. And like I said, most of their rules are actually > followed by every modern spell-checker and dictionary - only very few of > their rules (especially the one regarding kamats katan) is disputed. > This is consistent with my experience. > > > -- Thanks, Uri http://translation.israel.net -- Hebrew OpenOffice Mailing List [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://openoffice.org.il/mailman/listinfo/hebrew