Re: [native-lang] Update: Sun/NLC meeting

Hi Sophie, *,

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:30:35PM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
> [...]
> I'd like to recall here that this request was not only concerning RFEs, 
> but also existing features that are removed or changed without any 
> concertation.

Yes!

> As a good example of our help and contributions I'd like 
> to point two of them (no, no this is not the Stylist ;) among others :
> http://graphics.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=631
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48059
> related to this one 
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36372 (the feedback I 
> had from ministries is very strong here).

I filed issue 48146 to complement the scenario:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48146

It's all but obvious to me why the behaviour of the buttons did change.
It broke, I filed the issue (36372). It worked again, then the behaviour
of the buttons did change :-( (and issue 48059 was filed)

> >[...]
> >1. First, that we re-initiate the discussion of handling community input
> >for 3.0.  It's too early to set a date for when we should do this by,
> >but it makes sense to start thinking of it.  
> (Why is it too early?
> >Because there is no good sense even of what 3.0 will look like.) 
> 
> This is not too early because with the 2.0,

Well - talking about OOo 3.0 ist too early given that we don't know what
the process will be for OOo 2.1

> we are benifiting or will 
> benefit from a lot of feedback from users having needs that will not be 
> covered by 2.0 are no longer covered by it, so if the demand is strong 
> there might be considered for 3.0 or even sooner (my thoughts go to the 
> graphics module or some Calc functionalities).

Sooner! (for OOo 2.1)

> [...]

ciao
Christian
-- 
NP: Creed - Beautiful