Re: [native-lang] Update: Sun/NLC meeting

Charles-H.Schulz wrote:

>Hi,
>
>On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 23:12 +0200, David Fraser wrote:
>  
>
>>Actually what I think I find more disheartening is when there is little 
>>or no explanation. I understand that Sun has its own priorities, but 
>>often explaining why something is difficult or considered not worth the 
>>effort in terms of technical details would be a helpful addition to a RFE
>>    
>>
>
>As a side note, it seems to me that these issues could best be handled
>by the ESC. I hope this will be efficient in dealing with these issues.
>If an issue is marked as "wontfix" by Sun, any developer/company should
>be able to work on it and contribute its implementation/patch back to
>the central trunk or at least leave it on a cws until a final decision
>has been taken.
>
What would be the process for bringing an issue to the ESC?

David