Re: [native-lang] QA Process for Localized Builds
Andre Schnabel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.nativelanguage |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi hirano, Kazunari Hirano wrote: >HI all, >Our OpenOffice.org 2.0 release is approaching? :) >I don't know. You know? :) > > not much more than you know. >Anyway the OpenOffice.org Japanese Native Language Project is now >preparing for QA for Localized Builds. >http://qa.openoffice.org/localized/index.html >Will we do the same? >http://qa.openoffice.org/testcase/ >May we want to update OpenOffice.org Test, Shakedown Test Suite, for 2.0? >http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=4692 >These are our questions. >Do you have any idea? > > I'd suggest a mix of automated tests (to check, if files could be opened / saved, no crashes in basic functionality ...) and the TCM Test cases (to have some manual testing). Although TCM is focused on localization testing, it has some very usefull advantages: - I can track the stauts of older tests (no need to switch to issuezilla for searching) - I can track the status of current tests of other n/l teams ( I uses to have a closer look of all the issues, other teams found) - I can easily track what tests have been really done, when working with a number of people. Just my ideas, André