Re: [native-lang] New template project

KAMI <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.nativelanguage
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Charles-H.Schulz írta:
> Hi,
>
> KAMI a écrit :
>   
>> Charles-H.Schulz írta:
>>     
>>> Kami,
>>>
>>> perhaps we should wait for the results of the discussion on the
>>> extensions/marketplace/templates repository?
>>>       
>> Yes you are right. But I would like to clean things from my parts ASAP.
>> Where is the on gonig discussion about this article? Here? or on dev? or
>> other?
>>     
>
>
> on dev@ooo . But it does not move on, actually. :-(
>   
I noticed same. I am waiting on that list.
>   
>>>  Then we will start thinking
>>> about how to classify templates for OOo....
>>>   
>>>       
>> OpenOffice.org has internal folder stucture for that. I think we can use
>> it for basic arrange. Then later when we have our decision, we can
>> modify OOo and the repository to.
>>     
>
> Ah. So you were asking for people to help you for Oxygen Office? I think
> this list may not be very appropriate for this, Kami.
>   
No, I think It is a false point of view. They are OpenOffice.org 
templates firstly. I think they can be collected anywhere. Of course all 
of them in the free category might/should appear on OpenOffice.org site. 
I am not aganist to put templates to OpenOffice.org site. But until we 
are working to make them better and available for publicity. I am still 
waiting to put Hungarian templates to OpenOffice.org site. Also there 
are few questionable templates on OOo's site. I sent a letter to Scott 
and Garry in this subject. So you shuouldn't be upset about templates on 
other site. Also these templates are available to public via 
easy-to-install packages for OpenOffice.org.
> Charles.
>   

KAMI
>   
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Charles.
>>>   
>>>       
>> KAMI
>>     
>>> KAMI a écrit :
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> So let's start to work :o)
>>>>
>>>> For first step I will resort our templates info templates and
>>>> templates-nonfree category.Templates category should contains LGPL or
>>>> equivalent licensed materials. Subcategories remain untouched because
>>>> they come from OpenOffice.org itself. I saw German language templates
>>>> those uses different directory names. I think this is not a good thing
>>>> on the way to uniforming template collection. I also do same for
>>>> galleries. Galleries has a well collected license table where you can
>>>> check the license of every galleries. Petr did a good work when he
>>>> categorized lot of templates by license and also quality. Can someone
>>>> help to continue this work?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> KAMI
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.