Re: [native-lang] Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [native-lang] questions on ES builds

On 2/25/10, Charles-H. Schulz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes I did. I don't find it satisfactory, for three reasons.
>
> 1) as mh wrote on the issue as an answer to you, there was ample times
> and several RCs where l10n specific issues were raised, so how come your
>
> issue(s) were not raised?
>
> How you know we didn't look at issue
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108563
>
> 2) If the bugfix is scheduled for the 3.2.1 then wait for the 3.2.1. I'm
> sure that there are other bugs, l10n specific or not, but there is also
>
> a release process and schedules, so please follow them.
>
> I dont think I need to wait. As QA release lead for ES, I would have not
> approve a build with such issues, and would have probably wait for 3.2.1 all
> together skipping the 3.2 cycle. Fortunately this patches where accepted on
> Pavel's build so we release this.
>
> 3) Last but not least, we have a situation now where we have two sources
>
> for spanish builds. We have the vanilla one and the ones from Pavel.
>
> If what 108563 happens, and take the patches from Pootle then it shouldnt
> be any difference.
> This calls for one selection of one source the need to stick to it. You
> may, on the other hand have good reasons to distribute Pavel's builds,
> but then please state your reasons so that at least there is no
>
> duplication of effort. In any case, it's about coherence.
>
> No is about responsiveness, if builders decide to drop our issues as
> showstoppers and move to a different cycle, then we are also able to move to
> a different tree whenever we think this is trully a stopper for a release.
>
> Best,
> Charles.
>
> Le 24/02/10 20:06, Alexandro Colorado a écrit :
>
> > Did you read my response in the bug?
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello Alexandro, all,
> >
> >     It has come to my attention
> >     (http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109060
> >     <http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109060>) that the
> ES
> >     project is now proposing non vanilla builds (Pavel's builds) instead
> of
> >     the regular ones. I'm fine with Pavel's builds, but they are usually
> >     not used when a vanilla version is available.
> >
> >     Would you like to explain why the project chose this option?
> >
> >     Thank you,
> >     Charles.
> >
> >     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> >     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexandro Colorado
> > OpenOffice.org Espa&ntilde;ol
> > IM: [email protected]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Alexandro Colorado
OpenOffice.org Espa&ntilde;ol
IM: [email protected]