Re: Minutes for release status meeting from 2010-11-15

Rene Engelhard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.releases
Organization OpenOffice.org
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> The effect is that an office installation based on OOo before 3.3
> cannot share a URE installation with an office installation based on
> OOo 3.3 or later.  Sharing URE installations is only relevant on
> Linux and Solaris, not on Windows and Mac OS X, and is probably more
> of theoretical than practical concern.

If that was so, we wouldn't have the bug report :)...
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603549)

> Furthermore, the jvmaccess library is considered a private part of
> the URE (see <http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO330/file/e13523b45392/ure/source/README#l68>),
> so especially no OOo extensions should link against it (which might
> otherwise cause problems, causing those extensions to not work
> across the OOo 3.3 boundary).  The OOo basis layer code violates
> this privacy and does link against the library, causing the
> incompatibility to be noticed.

But it still would break when ure gets updated to 3.3 and vcl is still 3.2..
I don't think a Breaks: openoffice.org-core (<< 1:3.3) in 3.3s ure is a good
thing.
 
> Given this state of affairs, I do not think this issue should be
> considered a stopper for OOo 3.3.

I disagree. If it is easy to fix I think we should fix it..

Grüße/Regards,

René
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.