Re: Minutes for release status meeting from 2010-11-15
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.releases |
|---|---|
| Organization | OpenOffice.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > The effect is that an office installation based on OOo before 3.3 > cannot share a URE installation with an office installation based on > OOo 3.3 or later. Sharing URE installations is only relevant on > Linux and Solaris, not on Windows and Mac OS X, and is probably more > of theoretical than practical concern. If that was so, we wouldn't have the bug report :)... (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603549) > Furthermore, the jvmaccess library is considered a private part of > the URE (see <http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO330/file/e13523b45392/ure/source/README#l68>), > so especially no OOo extensions should link against it (which might > otherwise cause problems, causing those extensions to not work > across the OOo 3.3 boundary). The OOo basis layer code violates > this privacy and does link against the library, causing the > incompatibility to be noticed. But it still would break when ure gets updated to 3.3 and vcl is still 3.2.. I don't think a Breaks: openoffice.org-core (<< 1:3.3) in 3.3s ure is a good thing. > Given this state of affairs, I do not think this issue should be > considered a stopper for OOo 3.3. I disagree. If it is easy to fix I think we should fix it.. Grüße/Regards, René