C++ token move constructors/assignment with LALR

"Anthony Heading" <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:25:05 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.comp.parsers.bison.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Reminded by the mention of automove in the previous thread,  I agree it works really well, though for one of my uses I needed to add the move operators to my local C++ skeleton.   

So I was happy to see these were recently added in the bison repo: "This will be used in glr2.cc, which requires C++11.", but then sad to see them explicitly hidden from the other skeletons:  "don't publish move ctor to lalr1.cc".    Shouldn't the C++ version requirement ideally be determined in part from the user semantic type definition?  It seems a reasonable thing for a user to want a move-only type with an LALR1 grammar?  Or is the lalr.cc skeleton somewhat frozen/obsolescent/deprecated now and only GLR is recommended for new code?