Re: new pacification suggestion?
Akim Demaille <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.parsers.bison.patches,gmane.comp.parsers.bison.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Le 20 nov. 2018 à 21:32, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On 11/20/18 12:01 PM, Akim Demaille wrote: >> - if (false) >> + if ((false)) > > This goes too far. If clang is warning about this sort of thing, then we should disable that clang warning. Again, compilers should be our servants, not our masters. I don’t have any problems with having two pairs of parens, after all we’ve done that forever in the case of assignments in if’s etc. That’s a clear way to tell the others, including the compiler, that something fishy is intentional (until ‘sic’ becomes a keyword). The problem here is that it does not work, although it should.