Re: Is there a way to have two "cases" with one method?

> On 22 Aug 2022, at 18:12, Maury Markowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> In my BASIC interpreter’s bison code I have one of these:
> 
>  CHANGE variable TO variable
…
> CHANGE is from the original Dartmouth BASIC. It turns out that HP included an identical feature in their dialect, CONVERT. So I did:
…
>  CONVERT variable TO variable
> Works great.
> 
> My question is whether there is a simple way to combine the two to eliminate the duplicated code?

For example:

CHANGE_or_CONVERT variable TO variable;

CHANGE_or_CONVERT: CHANGE | CONVERT;