Re: [PATCH 5/9] build: reject C++ compilers that don't support std::vector::data

Hans Ã…berg <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:35:46 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.parsers.bison.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On 17 Aug 2021, at 08:49, Akim Demaille <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hi Hans,
>=20
>> Le 13 ao=C3=BBt 2021 =C3=A0 09:52, Hans =C3=85berg =
<[email protected]> a =C3=A9crit :
>>=20
>>> On 13 Aug 2021, at 08:11, Akim Demaille <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Le 12 ao=C3=BBt 2021 =C3=A0 10:40, Hans =C3=85berg =
<[email protected]> a =C3=A9crit :
>>>>=20
>>>> The member 'data' was introduced in C++11.
>>>>=20
>>>> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector/data
>>>=20
>>> That page is exactly the one I looked at first to see that it's =
C++98, not C++11.  Read the bottom of =
<https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector>.
>>=20
>> It is not in the C++98 ISO+IEC+14882-1998 standard (the PDF). In the =
C++11 n3242 draft, in sec. 23.3.6.1 Class template vector overview, =
class vector has between sections "element access" and "modifiers" a =
section "data access" with
>> T* data() noexcept; const
>> T* data() const noexcept
>> and it is also in a C++ draft standard I made from sources in 2015.
>>=20
>> So GCC is right on this one, and 4.2 is from 2007-2008, before C++11. =
You might try a later version with the -std=3Dc++98 option to see what =
it does.
>=20
> You need to read my answer, and the page it pointed you to.

But that is a proposal from 2004, does it mean it should be considered a =
part of C++98? =E2=80=94It would seem that once a standard has been =
official, it does not change. There is alos the C++03, but also that is =
earlier than that proposal.

https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue464