Re: [PATCH 5/9] build: reject C++ compilers that don't support std::vector::data
Hans Ã…berg <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:35:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.parsers.bison.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 17 Aug 2021, at 08:49, Akim Demaille <[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > Hi Hans, >=20 >> Le 13 ao=C3=BBt 2021 =C3=A0 09:52, Hans =C3=85berg = <[email protected]> a =C3=A9crit : >>=20 >>> On 13 Aug 2021, at 08:11, Akim Demaille <[email protected]> = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Le 12 ao=C3=BBt 2021 =C3=A0 10:40, Hans =C3=85berg = <[email protected]> a =C3=A9crit : >>>>=20 >>>> The member 'data' was introduced in C++11. >>>>=20 >>>> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector/data >>>=20 >>> That page is exactly the one I looked at first to see that it's = C++98, not C++11. Read the bottom of = <https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector>. >>=20 >> It is not in the C++98 ISO+IEC+14882-1998 standard (the PDF). In the = C++11 n3242 draft, in sec. 23.3.6.1 Class template vector overview, = class vector has between sections "element access" and "modifiers" a = section "data access" with >> T* data() noexcept; const >> T* data() const noexcept >> and it is also in a C++ draft standard I made from sources in 2015. >>=20 >> So GCC is right on this one, and 4.2 is from 2007-2008, before C++11. = You might try a later version with the -std=3Dc++98 option to see what = it does. >=20 > You need to read my answer, and the page it pointed you to. But that is a proposal from 2004, does it mean it should be considered a = part of C++98? =E2=80=94It would seem that once a standard has been = official, it does not change. There is alos the C++03, but also that is = earlier than that proposal. https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue464