Re: Encoding

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Joel de Guzman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> OvermindDL1 wrote:
>> You know how I suggested something like this for character encoding?
>>
>> parse<standard_wide>(...);
>> parse<utf8>(...);
>> parse<ascii>(...);
>> etc...
>>
>> Re-thinking it, what about just treating it like space, rule
>> definition could be like:
>> rule<Iterator,int(),encoding,space> // the int(), encoding, and space
>> parts being in any order of course, the encoding can be figured out by
>> a tag
>
> That's the idea I posted here:
> "Re: [lex] making lexer generic for char / wchar_t"

That was the thread, with my want of a parse<encoding> that made me
think more about how to actually implement this, hence this post.

Carl:  And I remember that other post from July or so, but I just
remember the removing of the return type of lit() from that post, not
the encoding discussion part.  :)

We do need something though, the namespace thing is irritating and is
causing me to do all kinds of weird macro work to get it generic...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev