Re: Proposal for qi::seek[] directive, next step?

On 10/7/2011 4:42 PM, TONGARI wrote:
> 2011/10/7 Joel de Guzman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
>     On 10/6/2011 6:29 PM, TONGARI wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi, again
>     >
>     > Have you guys made a decision?
> 
>     Pardon the delay. Yeah, let's have it in the repository.
> 
> 
> Nice to hear that, thank you :)
> Patches attached in this mail.
> 
> Is there "What's New" section for Spirit Repository?

You can add one. Patch welcome :)

> BTW, Is it too late for 1.48.0?

Not yet, it seems:

October 10: branches/release closed for major code changes. Still open
for serious problem fixes and docs changes.

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://boost-spirit.com




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2