Re: Proposal for qi::seek[] directive, next step?

On 10/8/2011 5:14 PM, TONGARI wrote:
> 2011/10/7 Joel de Guzman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
>     On 10/7/2011 4:42 PM, TONGARI wrote:
>     > 2011/10/7 Joel de Guzman <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >
>     >     On 10/6/2011 6:29 PM, TONGARI wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > Hi, again
>     >     >
>     >     > Have you guys made a decision?
>     >
>     >     Pardon the delay. Yeah, let's have it in the repository.
>     >
>     >
>     > Nice to hear that, thank you :)
>     > Patches attached in this mail.
>     >
>     > Is there "What's New" section for Spirit Repository?
> 
>     You can add one. Patch welcome :)
> 
> 
> Could you apply the seek_doc.patch first?
> Then I can make a patch against the revision.

Done. Please check trunk.

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://boost-spirit.com




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2