Re: Proposal for qi::seek[] directive, next step?

On 10/8/2011 9:42 PM, TONGARI wrote:
> 
> Checked.
> Patch attached, please check.

I've been having second thoughts on having this into Boost V1.48.0.
I think it's best if we let it cycle and settle a bit and have it
in trunk for the next Boost release. Is that OK with you?

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://boost-spirit.com




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2