Re: Possible regression in boost 1.61
Joel de Guzman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24/05/2016 11:40 PM, Peter Gerell wrote: > Hi Seth. > At the time the code wasn't in a state I was comfortable publishing. > Now I have managed to reproduce the problem with a much smaller example. > The code is available at https://github.com/pgerell/spirit_x3_problem. > > In the current state the program builds with boost 1.60 but not with 1.61. > > If I remove the x3::omit directive in https://github.com/pgerell/spirit_x3_problem/blob/master/common_def.h and uncomment the appropriate lines in https://github.com/pgerell/spirit_x3_problem/blob/master/ast.h the program builds with both boost versions. What's the exact type of start_rule() and what is the type from the linker error and what's the difference? Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j