Re: [Spirit Qi %] (x%y) not semantically equivalent to (x >> *(y >> x))
Joel de Guzman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28/05/2016 7:46 AM, Frank Hein wrote: > Ok. You are right. Verbously is explained in warming up sections somewhere that one can > use a%b as an abbreviation for a>>*(b >> a). Which you can't if you need b. Anyway, you > are right. Thanks for pointing that out. Admin hat on, please avoid snipping away context and please avoid top posting. Thanks! (http://www.boost.org/community/policy.html) Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e