Re: Community Poll: What do you think about qi supporting n-ary operators?
Frank Hein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Am 06.08.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Larry Evans <[email protected]>: > >> On 08/05/2016 10:21 PM, Frank Hein wrote: >> When I saw how ugly this post is formatted here, I decided to repost it as >> a comment >> to the pull request. With minor modifications, but with an additional risk >> added. :) >> >> Please go directly to https://github.com/boostorg/spirit/pull/200. You >> will find >> the post nicely formatted there at the end of the conversation. Sorry. > > Hi Frank, > > After a brief look, it looks promising; however, the code here: > > https://github.com/mxc-commons/MxcQitoo/blob/master/mxc/mxc/qitoo/operator/list2.hpp > > contains tabs, at least in the clone I just downloaded. > I realize this is just cosmetic; however, boost guidelines here: > > http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html#Tabs > > discourage this. You might plan on changing that eventually. Hi Larry, I'll change that. But please forget about qitoo for the moment. It's about the PR for qi your oppinion would be valuable. The Develop Branch of my fork of Spirit has the implementation. Without tabs anywhere, of course. :) Link is in the orig post. Regards, Frank > HTH. > > -regards, > Larry > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Spirit-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Spirit-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 5.1 KB) - not displayed