Usage of auto keyword in X3 tutorials
Stephan Menzel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEQ568tse1UO3GO3z9-JKpO8a1iCHHJGHGwaR3gN-A1qdabCkA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello everyone, as a long term user of spirit I finally wanted to take a lot at the X3 docs to see what changes. What I noticed quickly is the abundance of "auto" in the tutorials which leads me to believe that the ease of use is probably in parts due to this. Am I right with this? My problem is a deep distrust of auto and I have banned it in all our code. Looking at this for example: http://ciere.com/cppnow15/x3_docs/spirit/tutorials/complex___our_first_complex_parser.html Would this still look easy if instead of auto there would be actual types or typedefs? Or, to phrase my question more tongue in cheek: Would auto haters like the step towards X3? Thanks for opinions.. Stephan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Spirit-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general