Re: Design/structure X3 parser more like Qi parser

Larry Evans <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/13/2016 03:31 PM, Seth wrote:
[snip]
> Well. I did start off with the bad news because I think it's a
> performance /bug/.
> I agree that the performance doesn't entice a move to X3 for this
> particular grammar :)
>
> I haven't understood it fully but the profiler results seem to point at
> `parse_into_container` and `std::....::basic_string::aux_replace`
> (quoting from memory)

Hi Seth,

Could you please let us know how you profiled the code?
I'd like to see if I could do s similar profile on a revision
of spirit and this benchmark code to try and narrow down the
bug location.

-regards,
Larry
[snip]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.