Re: double_ parser is less precise than atof

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 04:14 PM, jfaust wrote:
> The following code demonstrates a small loss of precision using qi. I'm
> using
> VS 2013 and boost 1.60.0. The problem is shown near the end where an
> int64
> is converted to double.
> 
> The main problem for me is that I'm trying to replace an existing parser
> with qi. The small differences in precision are causing differences in
> our
> regression test suite.
> 
Did You forget to include the reproducing test code? I can't see it

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot