Re: [fusion] Proposal for deprecating fusion.tuple.

Larry,

>> [0] http://metaben.ch/hetero/clang++-4.0/make/index.html
>> [1] http://metaben.ch/hetero/g++-7/make/index.html
>>
> [0] shows hana tuple significantly better than the c++ `fusion::tuple`.
> Hence, why not replace fusion::tuple with hana tuple?
In my thought, Hana is value-first but Fusion (and standard one) is
type-first.
AFAIK, hana always construct via `hana::make` function and deduce it,
like this.

```
auto t = hana::make<hana::tuple_tag>(1, "foo", 3.14f);
```

OTOH, fusion tuple can be typedef-ed, declare value, and construct from
value like hana.

```
using T = fusion::vector<int, char const*, float>;
T t;
t = fusion::make_vector(1, "foo", 3.14f);
```

It's just a style, user can choose what they wanted.

Kohei

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

_______________________________________________
Spirit-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=geSL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----