Re: Oct parser vs octet parser

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Mikael Asplund <[email protected]> wrote:
> From the page you linked: "Parse an octal integer into an unsigned"... it parses an octal (base 8)  number, as opposed to a decimal or hexadecimal number.

Thanks, that's what I was thinking, but it wasn't especially clear.

And hex? (digit | char_('a', 'f') | char_('A', 'F'))?

If so, why not just say so and make it clear?

i.e. oct: Parse an octal (base 8, char_('0', '7')) integer into an unsigned

> Regards,
>   Mikael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Powell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 05:40
> To: Spirit General Mailing List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Spirit-general] Oct parser vs octet parser
>
> Hello,
>
> Am I correct in saying that the "oct" parser is not the same thing as saying "octet" parser (i.e. for IPv4 addresses)?
>
> https://ciere.com/cppnow15/x3_docs/spirit/quick_reference/numeric.html
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael Powell
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________
> Spirit-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Spirit-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot