Re: Strength of sequence vs alternative parsers

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Mikael Asplund <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_precedence

Ah, I see. Basically honoring the same language operator precedence
rules. Incredible, awesome! Thanks...

> So, yes...
>
>   /Mikael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Powell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 16:08
> To: Spirit General Mailing List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Spirit-general] Strength of sequence vs alternative parsers
>
> Hello,
>
> Am I correct in observing that the Sequence parser (>>) is stronger than the alternative parser (|)?
>
> i.e.
>
> my_rule = a >> b >> c | d >> e >> f ;
>
> So, in other words, parenthesis are unnecessary, per se?
>
> my_rule = ( a >> b >> c ) | ( d >> e >> f ) ;
>
> Unless those groupings require additional operators, like Optional (-), let's say.
>
> my_rule = ( a >> b >> c ) | ( d >> -( e >> f ) ) ;
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael Powell
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________
> Spirit-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Spirit-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot