Re: IPv6 address parsing
Michael Powell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMEoF_HWU9pN6OHOTUnei3xFNCV10AJ-6jbp=+FAV5wAaLPYLA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Seth <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07-12-17 12:32, Michael Powell wrote: >> Why do you call it "contraption" when it is the octet grammar? > > I forgot to answer: because it's not working, it's error-prone, it's > about 10x as complicated as it should, about 10x as long as it should be > and likely 10x as slow as it should be. > >> what do you call "comparable"? > Usually taken to mean "comparing for equality". In IPv4, addresses are > EQUAL even if the representation is not. Fair enough. How about in the scope of an IPv6 address? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot