Re: X3: declare/define/instantiate linker error

Michael Powell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.general
Message-ID <CAMEoF_EWuUeZhNFDmFT_9TUwbB3q-aWjhn5LFrS_kHgnGkRqyg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Seth <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18-05-17 10:52, Tore Halvorsen wrote:
>> Is there another way to split parsers into different parts?
>
> My $0.02 is here
> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Design-structure-X3-parser-more-like-Qi-parser-tp4690205p4690215.html

Re: function-local parsers, sounds interesting. You might even declare
them "static" within the function in order to avoid multiple warm ups.
Although with that you may also need to consider concurrency issues,
I'm not positive; haven't fully vetted that notion myself.

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Spirit-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.