Re: How to force attribute propagation in x3 when using semantic actions

Alberto Luaces writes:

> Seth writes:
>
>> On 15-12-17 16:32, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>>> I tried before posting, but it makes no difference for me:
>>>
>>> http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/b58b992c2a5df373
>>
>>         // Let us pretend that this parses a list and not only two entities.
>>
>> Pretending doesn't make compilers happy. You need something that is
>> actually compatible with your attribute type.
>>
>
> I though it was: at least on the Qi documentation[1] it is said that:
>
> A >> A → vector<A>
>
> I will check if for x3 things are different.
>

It seems things are the same in x3 —is it a bug that I have to
explicitly specify that A >> A returns a vector<A> instead of tuple<A>?

https://ciere.com/cppnow15/x3_docs/spirit/quick_reference/compound_attribute_rules.html

-- 
Alberto


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Spirit-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general