Re: [cowiki-dev] parser hacking

Yes, unrecognized tags are now processed. Please don't turnaround the 
emphasis processing! ** will be left as a double asterisk if there is no 
other on the line. People can use triple asterisk if they really need to.

Regards,

Archie

PAUL HANCHETT wrote:

> I'm making progress on unit tests, very pleased actually.  I can give 
> you a bug to look at though--
>
> Enter this text on a wiki page:
>
>     What happens if there is no <eoln> on a line of text?
>
> Unrecognized tags seem to cause a problem.  In my case, the test never 
> finishes!
>
> I also have a question-- I had proposed using a style like **bold** 
> for emphasis and "****" to mean "**".   After trying to use it, I'm 
> not so sure that's the correct answer.  How about reverting to 
> "*bold*" and using "**bold**" to mean literal "*bold*" without 
> highlighting (same quoting idea).
>
> Archie, everyone: votes?
>
> Paul
>
> Archie Campbell wrote:
>
>> Sy,
>>
>> My new files have "[(target)(alias) deleted-page-msg]" for old 
>> "[deleted-page-msg]". I'm still waiting for a green light for the 
>> parser, or more test files from paulha. It's a minor but much needed 
>> fix.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Archie
>>
>> Sy wrote:
>>
>>> The problem is when coWiki (and I'm VERY angry about this) replaces
>>> the link name with [deleted page] or whatever.  That's horrific..
>>> especially when I don't remember what the link was for.
>>>