Re: [cowiki-dev] Unit Testing

Daniel T. Gorski wrote:

>There is only one "but" :) But: as of the language structure of loose
>variable typing it will get difficult to test PHP/coWiki scripts -
>especially if there are methods that have variables passed prefixedwith an
>"$m", which stands for "mixed": public function method($mFoo) .. or return
>such "mixed" variables (string or array e.g).
>  
>
Yes, you are right.  Unit testing always produces an X% solution where X 
 > 0,  something is tested.  If unit testing is not done, X==0 and there 
is more work to do.

Unit testing doesn't prove the code is *right*, it only proves that some 
of it is not _wrong_!

Unit testing is one of just a few disciplines from XP that I agree 
with!  ;-)

>Anyway unit testing is good, but you'll swear in many cases in current coWiki
>:)
>  
>
:-)

Paul