Re: [cowiki-dev] The coWiki.org page
"Daniel T. Gorski" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:30:13 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.cowiki.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050629233013.GI17810@bantha> |
On 29 Jun 11:50, Paul Hanchett wrote:
> Daniel T. Gorski wrote:
> >the main cowiki.org page is still broken ("bad magic"). Anyway, some has to
> >care about it (not only Sy). I suggested a "News" section on the first page
> >a time ago.
> So what do you want us to do?
Me, as meanwhile only coWiki _user_ would like to find some structured
information about the healthiness/continuity of the project: what's new,
what's to come. Maybe this information is valuable for others too.
> The page was changed from what I originally did and I have no idea what
> the changes were.
I would suggest - if it is not recoverable without any means - at least to
correct the broken links on the coWiki main page and (re-)introduce a "news"
section that is going to be frequently updated (if necessary of course).
So far I tried to keep out of the contents of the coWiki.org main-page
itself, as I thought you guys should put your own stamp on it. Unfortunately
it stayed broken for two months.
Should I (can I) change/rearange the contents the way I would like to see
it?
> "Bad magic" is hardly an adequate description of the data loss, I mean
> /really!/
Hm, pardon? You know what I was speaking of? We used the "bad magic" phrase
for qualification of the error, so that we know what we were talking about.
It is not important whether it is a good name or not.
In this context, I would suggest (as already stated in the last email) to
install dev.cowiki.org (or test.cowiki.org, or latest.cowiki.org or, or)
with the CVS head and full activated logging (E_ALL) to play with. Maybe the
"bad magic" is gone? If not, we were sure that it was not a transaction
problem.
The imprortant thing here would be, that anyone of us takes a look from time
to time of these pages.
regards dtg