Re: [cowiki-dev] The coWiki.org page
Vish Vishvanath <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:28:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.cowiki.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The main page magically reverted to an earlier revision while > destroying the content and history of the current revision. This has > happened a second time since the first report. Ok, I finally got you. > > The page was edited several times over a few weeks and being the > single most important page on cowiki.org, it was a minor work of art. > At the very least, it was a horrible slap in the face to see that work > vanish. Yup. Lesson we learn is to do important work like this on personal machines first... Ah well. > > Now, having said that I can go ahead and begin rewriting it.. as they > say in the wiki world .. I can "be bold" and if something bothers me I > can go ahead and fix it. > > I've not done this because I had hoped that it was easy to restore the > page from a backup and also because I was really depressed about > losing my work. Yeah - that sucks. Fair enough - pain in the arse all round for everyone. > > Now.. the way things look, I'm going to begin rewriting that page. > But until this bug is tracked down and fixed, could we please look > into making the process of restoring a single page a little easier? > The database is backed up everyday in the form of a db dumpfile, which makes restoration a damn sight easier than hunting through fsdump files for mysql MYIs and the like. > Actually, if it were possible to have a read-only time-shifted version > of the server that would solve this problem perfectly. A secondary > wiki which is using a data backup from a week ago would probably do > it. I know that's easy to say.. is it any easier compared to fishing > for a single page from a backup? Time-shifting in the sense of having a staging server which pushes changes to the live server on command, for example? Quite possible - people come up with ways and means?