Re: [cowiki-dev] Releasing coWiki with the "working" parser

I will consider this Daniel.  I do not think that the changes we have 
made thus far constitute a major release-- What user visible changes are 
there, aside from the installer (which admittedly is a very nice 
feature...)?

The major weakness in coWiki is that there is no way to integrate HTML 
documents or images from other systems into the wiki display.  It is not 
possible to upload a document for retrieval from a link on the wiki 
page.  Yes, links can be put onto the page, but it takes separate access 
to the server to place images and documents for retrieval.

I will review our list on Saturday and make some headway on it.

Paul

Daniel T. Gorski wrote:

>Hi,
>
>What do you think about releasing Fullerene with the old working parser and
>the new features so far? People would become more aware of coWiki [1] and
>the parser changes could be introduced in 0.4.x or such. Apparently the new
>parser does not work like the people were used to it and is buggy too.
>
>Maybe a shorter release cycle would be good for the the whole project. And
>its a 0.4.ZERO release, so that nobody can blame you for real errors.
>
>ACID transactions are implemented, and should be tested. Changes to the
>parser are not necessary for Fullerene: we just take the 3-5 classes that
>worked for Boron.
>
>What do you think? Spread the word, or not?
>
>regards dtg
>
>[1] on each release the number of users rises.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>  
>