Re: [PHP-DEV] [Concept] declare(strict_identifiers=1)

"Larry Garfield" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.php.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026, at 2:42 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> The survey answers a different question: if a maintainer adds the declare
> to a file they already have, does it still compile? That is adoption
> friction, not breakage. It is also a calibration check -- a rule that
> rejected a lot of legitimate existing code would be the wrong rule, and I
> wanted to know that before proposing it rather than after.
>
>  > Do I understand it correctly that by adding that declare to 168604 you
>  > would uncover a single risky identifier? Not that convincing...
>
> That number is the cost, not the benefit, and I should have separated the
> two more clearly.
>
> The single Packagist finding is what would stop compiling: symfony/cache
> declares a class whose entire name is the single byte 0xA9. That is the
> whole measured adoption cost across the 250 most-installed packages.

If this is so rarely seen in the wild (something that should be verified with more than 250 packages), why make it an option?  Just plan that PHP 9 will enforce UTF-8-or-GTFO rules on identifiers, Symfony updates one oddball class, and we move on with life.  99.99% of developers won't notice anything happened.

--Larry Garfield
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.