Re: [PHP-DEV] AI generated mails
سپهر محمودی <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+Jcf5sp0LsEDLwRwa99_xqvBGVoQygs_SCD1TVx2UKbH61iAw@mail.gmail.com> |
در تاریخ شنبه ۲۹ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۱۵:۱۳ youkidearitai <[email protected]> نوشت: > > > --------------------------- > Yuya Hamada (tekimen) > - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info > - https://github.com/youkidearitai > ----------------------------- > > 2026年8月29日(土) 20:22 سپهر محمودی <[email protected]>: > >> Hello dear Yuya, >> >> Yuya, this message was very important — that's why I'm sharing it only >> with you. Due to a specific medical condition, I can only work at my >> computer for 1 hour per day. That's why the design process for my functions >> takes a bit longer. >> >> After this function, God willing, I will begin my work as an official >> contributor to the intl extension and add grapheme and Persian language >> functions to PHP. In one of the examples for each RFC, I'll also include a >> Japanese example so you can feel assured. >> >> Please send your reply only to my personal email. >> >> With appreciation, >> Sepehr >> >> >> در تاریخ جمعه ۲۸ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۱۰:۱۵ youkidearitai <[email protected]> >> نوشت: >> >>> 2026年8月28日(金) 8:24 سپهر محمودی <[email protected]>: >>> > >>> > Hello Mr. Yuya, >>> > I am sending this email to you personally because I felt uncomfortable >>> having it go to the mailing list. >>> > I do know PHP and C coding, but—partly to boost my standing—I used to >>> rely on AI for my responses; I would provide the answer, and the AI would >>> write it out. >>> > However, I wrote this particular one myself. >>> > If you don't mind this approach, I could provide the answer to the AI >>> and let it respond as usual; otherwise, I will write the responses myself, >>> as I did this time. >>> > Also, please forgive me for the remark I made regarding the esteemed >>> Rasmus Lerdorf. >>> > I look forward to your reply. >>> > Please send your response only to me so the list doesn't find out. >>> > Best regards, >>> > Sepehr >>> > >>> > >>> > در تاریخ پنجشنبه ۲۷ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۱۴:۲۳ youkidearitai < >>> [email protected]> نوشت: >>> >> >>> >> 2026年8月26日(水) 20:44 سپهر محمودی <[email protected]>: >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > در تاریخ چهارشنبه ۲۶ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۰۵:۴۹ Pierre Joye < >>> [email protected]> نوشت: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Hi Osama, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 1:48 AM Osama Aldemeery < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Not trying to speak for anyone here, but it seems like the >>> concern >>> >> >> > about AI use on the list isn't really about helping with >>> translation >>> >> >> > or other genuine values of AI. That has been said explicitly >>> more than >>> >> >> > once, and I don't think anyone has actually argued against it. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > What has been objected to, though, is a tool authoring the >>> argument >>> >> >> > itself, with a person just forwarding it as their own. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I would be interested to know how to differentiate this. It will >>> aslo >>> >> >> pop ups quickly during discussions. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Watermark maybe? ;-) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > If that is roughly right, then I think the problem isn't really >>> about >>> >> >> > using AI per se, it's probably more about >>> >> >> > engagement/authenticity/authorship. Which is something a policy >>> could >>> >> >> > probably be written around. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Please no more policies. It is already too much and one needs a Sr >>> VP >>> >> >> of compliance to parse some of the existing one to make sense of >>> them. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Additionally, a written policy would make it easier for those >>> who rely >>> >> >> > on AI to blend in by drawing the guardrails and explicitly >>> stating >>> >> >> > what is and isn't acceptable. Something that would keep the list >>> as >>> >> >> > welcoming as it has always been without draining people's energy. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> If we start to add even more barriers, we are not welcoming, we are >>> >> >> guarding railing contributions on subjective interpretation of what >>> >> >> one wrote, or how. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Best, >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> Pierre >>> >> >> >>> >> >> @pierrejoye >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > ---------- >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi everyone, >>> >> > >>> >> > Please, let's bring this discussion to an end. >>> >> > >>> >> > Continuing this thread is only hurting PHP's reputation and >>> disrespects the immense hard work of esteemed contributors like Rasmus >>> Lerdorf. >>> >> > >>> >> > As a newcomer and a contributor specifically to the ext/intl >>> extension, I believe there's no reason for us to cause unnecessary tension >>> among ourselves. The current policies are already in place, and we cannot >>> perform miracles overnight. >>> >> > >>> >> > Let's focus our energy on building and improving PHP together. >>> >> > >>> >> > Best regards, >>> >> > Sepehr >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> Hi Sepehr >>> >> >>> >> > Continuing this thread is only hurting PHP's reputation and >>> disrespects the immense hard work of esteemed contributors like Rasmus >>> Lerdorf. >>> >> >>> >> That is not for you to say. >>> >> To reconfirm your position: your using the AI that trying communicate >>> us. >>> >> Your position is tolerated by a small number of non-native English >>> >> speakers, likes we. >>> >> >>> >> However, If you undermine that trust, you will immediately lose your >>> position. >>> >> If that happens, the community will likely conclude that there is no >>> >> point in saying anything to the AI. >>> >> >>> >> Please be careful. >>> >> Yuya >>> >> -- >>> >> --------------------------- >>> >> Yuya Hamada (tekimen) >>> >> - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info >>> >> - https://github.com/youkidearitai >>> >> ----------------------------- >>> >>> Hi Sepehr >>> >>> Thank you for adding my name. >>> For your Information: There is Kanji's in my name, Yuya is 侑弥 >>> Could you like add my Kanji? >>> >>> Regards >>> Yuya >>> >>> -- >>> --------------------------- >>> Yuya Hamada (tekimen) >>> - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info >>> - https://github.com/youkidearitai >>> ----------------------------- >>> >> > > Hi > > This(reply only me) is the break of internals rule, So I reply the > internals. > > What is your question? What I should I do? > > Regards > Yuya > ----------------- > Hello everyone. > Dear Yuya—this was just for information; > I didn't mean anything by it. > Understood; from now on, I will abide by the rules— > provided, of course, that the members don't deem me an offender again⁸ > >