Re: [PHP-DEV] AI generated mails

سپهر محمودی <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.php.devel
Message-ID <CA+Jcf5sp0LsEDLwRwa99_xqvBGVoQygs_SCD1TVx2UKbH61iAw@mail.gmail.com>
در تاریخ شنبه ۲۹ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۱۵:۱۳ youkidearitai <[email protected]>
نوشت:

>
>
> ---------------------------
> Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
> - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
> - https://github.com/youkidearitai
> -----------------------------
>
> 2026年8月29日(土) 20:22 سپهر محمودی <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hello dear Yuya,
>>
>> Yuya, this message was very important — that's why I'm sharing it only
>> with you. Due to a specific medical condition, I can only work at my
>> computer for 1 hour per day. That's why the design process for my functions
>> takes a bit longer.
>>
>> After this function, God willing, I will begin my work as an official
>> contributor to the intl extension and add grapheme and Persian language
>> functions to PHP. In one of the examples for each RFC, I'll also include a
>> Japanese example so you can feel assured.
>>
>> Please send your reply only to my personal email.
>>
>> With appreciation,
>> Sepehr
>>
>>
>> در تاریخ جمعه ۲۸ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۱۰:۱۵ youkidearitai <[email protected]>
>> نوشت:
>>
>>> ‪2026年8月28日(金) 8:24 ‫سپهر محمودی‬‎ <[email protected]>:‬
>>> >
>>> > Hello Mr. Yuya,
>>> > I am sending this email to you personally because I felt uncomfortable
>>> having it go to the mailing list.
>>> > I do know PHP and C coding, but—partly to boost my standing—I used to
>>> rely on AI for my responses; I would provide the answer, and the AI would
>>> write it out.
>>> > However, I wrote this particular one myself.
>>> > If you don't mind this approach, I could provide the answer to the AI
>>> and let it respond as usual; otherwise, I will write the responses myself,
>>> as I did this time.
>>> > Also, please forgive me for the remark I made regarding the esteemed
>>> Rasmus Lerdorf.
>>> > I look forward to your reply.
>>> > Please send your response only to me so the list doesn't find out.
>>> > Best regards,
>>> > Sepehr
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > در تاریخ پنجشنبه ۲۷ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۱۴:۲۳ youkidearitai <
>>> [email protected]> نوشت:
>>> >>
>>> >> ‪2026年8月26日(水) 20:44 ‫سپهر محمودی‬‎ <[email protected]>:‬
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > در تاریخ چهارشنبه ۲۶ اوت ۲۰۲۶، ۰۵:۴۹ Pierre Joye <
>>> [email protected]> نوشت:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Hi Osama,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 1:48 AM Osama Aldemeery <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > Not trying to speak for anyone here, but it seems like the
>>> concern
>>> >> >> > about AI use on the list isn't really about helping with
>>> translation
>>> >> >> > or other genuine values of AI. That has been said explicitly
>>> more than
>>> >> >> > once, and I don't think anyone has actually argued against it.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > What has been objected to, though, is a tool authoring the
>>> argument
>>> >> >> > itself, with a person just forwarding it as their own.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I would be interested to know how to differentiate this. It will
>>> aslo
>>> >> >> pop ups quickly during discussions.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Watermark maybe? ;-)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > If that is roughly right, then I think the problem isn't really
>>> about
>>> >> >> > using AI per se, it's probably more about
>>> >> >> > engagement/authenticity/authorship. Which is something a policy
>>> could
>>> >> >> > probably be written around.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Please no more policies. It is already too much and one needs a Sr
>>> VP
>>> >> >> of compliance to parse some of the existing one to make sense of
>>> them.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > Additionally, a written policy would make it easier for those
>>> who rely
>>> >> >> > on AI to blend in by drawing the guardrails and explicitly
>>> stating
>>> >> >> > what is and isn't acceptable. Something that would keep the list
>>> as
>>> >> >> > welcoming as it has always been without draining people's energy.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> If we start to add even more barriers, we are not welcoming, we are
>>> >> >> guarding railing contributions on subjective interpretation of what
>>> >> >> one wrote, or how.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Best,
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> Pierre
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> @pierrejoye
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ----------
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi everyone,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Please, let's bring this discussion to an end.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Continuing this thread is only hurting PHP's reputation and
>>> disrespects the immense hard work of esteemed contributors like Rasmus
>>> Lerdorf.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > As a newcomer and a contributor specifically to the ext/intl
>>> extension, I believe there's no reason for us to cause unnecessary tension
>>> among ourselves. The current policies are already in place, and we cannot
>>> perform miracles overnight.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Let's focus our energy on building and improving PHP together.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best regards,
>>> >> > Sepehr
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Sepehr
>>> >>
>>> >> > Continuing this thread is only hurting PHP's reputation and
>>> disrespects the immense hard work of esteemed contributors like Rasmus
>>> Lerdorf.
>>> >>
>>> >> That is not for you to say.
>>> >> To reconfirm your position: your using the AI that trying communicate
>>> us.
>>> >> Your position is tolerated by a small number of non-native English
>>> >> speakers, likes we.
>>> >>
>>> >> However, If you undermine that trust, you will immediately lose your
>>> position.
>>> >> If that happens, the community will likely conclude that there is no
>>> >> point in saying anything to the AI.
>>> >>
>>> >> Please be careful.
>>> >> Yuya
>>> >> --
>>> >> ---------------------------
>>> >> Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
>>> >> - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
>>> >> - https://github.com/youkidearitai
>>> >> -----------------------------
>>>
>>> Hi Sepehr
>>>
>>> Thank you for adding my name.
>>> For your Information: There is Kanji's in my name, Yuya is 侑弥
>>> Could you like add my Kanji?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Yuya
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
>>> - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
>>> - https://github.com/youkidearitai
>>> -----------------------------
>>>
>>
>
> Hi
>
> This(reply only me) is the break of internals rule, So I reply the
> internals.
>
> What is your question? What I should I do?
>
> Regards
> Yuya
> -----------------
>

Hello everyone.
> Dear Yuya—this was just for information;
> I didn't mean anything by it.
> Understood; from now on, I will abide by the rules—
> provided, of course, that the members don't deem me an offender again⁸
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.