Re: Experimental opening of php/doc-en issues
Nikita Popov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.documentation.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF+90c_Sq83eFCWSfpFo0jB+cPWXH=DO1yZS_Sf72-Ju0GEd+A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:42 AM Peter Cowburn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 16:02, Christoph M. Becker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 21.10.2021 at 16:33, Nikita Popov wrote: >> > >> > To follow up on this, I'd like to disable the option to submit a >> > "Documentation Problem" on bugs.php.net with >> > https://github.com/php/web-bugs/pull/107. Instead, submitters are >> directed >> > to issues on php/doc-en. This avoids having two places where new >> > documentation bugs may be submitted. Are there any objections to doing >> > this? (It's still possible to reclassify submitted bugs as doc problems >> > after the fact.) >> >> +1 >> > > In principle, I'm +1. > > Is there any project/team that would be blocked by this? I'm thinking > along the lines of maaaaybe a PECL package that doesn't have their docs in > php/doc-* but does use the bug tracker. > Here's the intersection of "Documentation Problem" and "PECL": https://bugs.php.net/search.php?limit=40&order_by=id&direction=DESC&cmd=display&status=Open&bug_type=Documentation+Problem&project=PECL From a cursory look I can only spot the "uuid" extension missing from php.net -- and the bug report is complaining about precisely that fact :) So it doesn't seem like PECL exts are using bugs.php.net to track their custom documentation. > I'm going to assume this also affects the "Documentation Problem" package > as well as the ticket type, right? > I haven't disabled that one yet, but I agree we should. Actually, this should have happened ages ago, ever since "Documentation Problem" became a separate bug type rather than a package. > If directing submitters to one other place to create their issue, it > should be an appropriate place for all documentation issues. > github.com/php/doc-en is not that place. > To clarify, are you talking about translations here? We could adjust the issue creation process on doc-en to link to other repos for translation issues, though I think it's also fine to let people report translation issues on doc-en, which we then transfer to a more appropriate repo. Depends on how common they are. In either case doc-en would be the entry point though, just a question of adjusting issue templates. Regards, Nikita