Re: OOP

Sam Tresler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.php.drupal.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"I don't think anyone can argue that object oriented is also equal to 
bloat.  I need a user's name, I load a user object from a user ID which 
does a million queries or so."

No. That would be poor coding. To avoid it, I generally build a few 
static methods into managers for handling simple tasks. Not sure how 
Drupal does it currently, but in another fully object oriented framework 
I work with it looks like:

UserManager::get_username(uid);

And runs one query. I do not, however, have a static method for 
non-commonly used things, such as a user's last login time, or join date.

Object Oriented most certainly does not mean bloat. Bad code and 
architecture mean bloat.

Regards,
   Sam Tresler

On 02/22/2012 11:46 AM, Ashraf Amayreh wrote:
> Hold on your horses. First off, I don't think object oriented is ALL
> bad. Some things naturally map to objects like user, node, menu, etc,
> what I am talking about is trying to fit everything into objects.
>
> I don't think anyone can argue that object oriented is also equal to
> bloat. I need a user's name, I load a user object from a user ID which
> does a million queries or so. As Joe Armstrong, the inventor of Erlang
> put it:
>
> "The problem with object-oriented languages is they've got all this
> implicit environment that they carry around with them. You wanted a
> banana but what you got was a gorilla holding the banana and the entire
> jungle."
>
> When an addition application turns into two objects from the Integer
> class using the + method, and when some wise-ass architect wants you to
> objectify everything, it does get quite ridiculous. Of course not to
> mention the 10 times CPU and memory resources used to achieve it.
>
> Finally, I don't think many will disagree that when you start thinking
> about a problem and its solution, you don't start thinking objects.
>
> Would love to get the opinions, or better yet, the experience of people
> who've read others' code written functionally vs OOP. Again, we're not
> talking about small systems or lousily written ones, but large
> enterprise systems. I for one get driven crazy following classes,
> inheritance and finding that each variable is a new class somewhere
> that's an aggregate of 10 other classes that I have to understand to
> debug a simple problem. It could just be me of course :)
>
>
> --
> Ashraf Amayreh
> CEO | O-Minds
> Cell. 962 78 8099997
> Tel. 962 6 5655150
> Fax. 962 6 5675150
> Skype: aamayreh
>
> www.o-minds.com <http://www.o-minds.com>
> web development | web design
> user experience | branding design
>
> Connect with us on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/ominds
>
> Connect with us on LinkedIn
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aamayreh
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.