Re: OOP
Sam Tresler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.drupal.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"I don't think anyone can argue that object oriented is also equal to bloat. I need a user's name, I load a user object from a user ID which does a million queries or so." No. That would be poor coding. To avoid it, I generally build a few static methods into managers for handling simple tasks. Not sure how Drupal does it currently, but in another fully object oriented framework I work with it looks like: UserManager::get_username(uid); And runs one query. I do not, however, have a static method for non-commonly used things, such as a user's last login time, or join date. Object Oriented most certainly does not mean bloat. Bad code and architecture mean bloat. Regards, Sam Tresler On 02/22/2012 11:46 AM, Ashraf Amayreh wrote: > Hold on your horses. First off, I don't think object oriented is ALL > bad. Some things naturally map to objects like user, node, menu, etc, > what I am talking about is trying to fit everything into objects. > > I don't think anyone can argue that object oriented is also equal to > bloat. I need a user's name, I load a user object from a user ID which > does a million queries or so. As Joe Armstrong, the inventor of Erlang > put it: > > "The problem with object-oriented languages is they've got all this > implicit environment that they carry around with them. You wanted a > banana but what you got was a gorilla holding the banana and the entire > jungle." > > When an addition application turns into two objects from the Integer > class using the + method, and when some wise-ass architect wants you to > objectify everything, it does get quite ridiculous. Of course not to > mention the 10 times CPU and memory resources used to achieve it. > > Finally, I don't think many will disagree that when you start thinking > about a problem and its solution, you don't start thinking objects. > > Would love to get the opinions, or better yet, the experience of people > who've read others' code written functionally vs OOP. Again, we're not > talking about small systems or lousily written ones, but large > enterprise systems. I for one get driven crazy following classes, > inheritance and finding that each variable is a new class somewhere > that's an aggregate of 10 other classes that I have to understand to > debug a simple problem. It could just be me of course :) > > > -- > Ashraf Amayreh > CEO | O-Minds > Cell. 962 78 8099997 > Tel. 962 6 5655150 > Fax. 962 6 5675150 > Skype: aamayreh > > www.o-minds.com <http://www.o-minds.com> > web development | web design > user experience | branding design > > Connect with us on Twitter > http://twitter.com/ominds > > Connect with us on LinkedIn > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aamayreh