Re: To 'f' or not to 'f'
Steve Matzura <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:47:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/11/2024 11:43 AM, John Iliffe wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 08:56 -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
>>
>> Under some now ancient version of PHP--probably 6, I had a cron job that read:
>>
>> php -f {my-php-script}
>>
>> and it ran every day like it was supposed to. Now, under 8.3, the job did not execute any more. I
>> removed the '-f' from the line in cron, and the job runs. What is the difference between with and
>> without 'f' if '-f' is supposed to be superfluous?
>>
> The php man page says:
> -------
> --file file
> -f file Parse and execute file
> -------
> so it looks like it should work but why the { } block? That may be confusing cron.
>
> John
>
the {my-php-script} was just supposed to be a placeholder for the email.
The actuaql cron command is:
cd /home/tgvpadmin/domains/theglobalvoice.info/public_html && php -f
mail_gallery_updates.php
With "-f" in the command, it runs, a mail message is created and sent
out by Postfix--I can see it in the mail log, but the message never gets
to the intended recipients. I removed the "-f", and it works.
Coincidence? I don't think so. Since it doesn't generate any log, which
I would get via email, I can't imagine why it wouldn't work with the
"-f" in the command. It's academic at this point, as removing the "-f"
caused it to work, so I'm leaving it that way.