Re: off topic! -- hey list. looking for any sight that does the following.
Rene Veerman <[email protected]> Sat, 15 Mar 2025 01:41:57 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACMzB5fXw-RW9eBqw4kfk=1JN=opz9FGTCtmg1TP6bKxwae9wQ@mail.gmail.com> |
i've got something in alpha stage over at https://said.by, available as sources through https://nicer.app and https://github.com/NicerEnterprises/NicerApp-WebOS and a still unfinished license (https://nicer.app/license) which is not totally free for startups, has discounts for big tech, etc, but i'm not asking for input on Dutch tax law yet, and will eventually find a reliable Dutch lawyer to help me finalize and also update my license when i am informed by the Dutch official municipal business bureau (https://kvk.nl) that it needs updating. :) i think my pricing model is spot on reasonable if you ask me. and could be Dutch tax compatible already ;) Met vriendelijke groet, Rene AJM Veerman Eigenaar + Algemeen, Technisch & Financieel directeur van https://nicer.app en gerelateerde websites. With kind regards, Owner + CEO, CTO & CFO for https://nicer.app and related websites. On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:23 AM bruce <[email protected]> wrote: > Not a php dev issue, although might tum intone. > > I'm asking the list if anyone has seen any kind of free web app that > allows you to post docs/content. > > User would access the site. > site would display the doc/sections, with bullet points in a > slide/caousel manner. There would be a section/subsection menu on the left > side that would be highlighted as user walked through sections, or user > could select a given item in the nenu to get to the "slide" in the carousel. > > sortof:: > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > menu | > secs carousel/slider > subPages bullet point/content > before / next (actionBTNs) > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > addition page/site content > . > . > . > > I apologize for being off topic on this, but list is slow! > > oh, I did have a php issue, but it was getting my head aroud the closure > implementation -- basically a typo! > > thanks > >