Re: Re: Custom fields totally changed??

Tim Daeleman wrote:

> I get it a bit more now, still don't know why al these fields are set 
> to false?? 

Good question! :)

> And the force_seq option is also mysterious for me.

I only wanted to test if it works with auto_increment ...

>
> Could you tell me how the array looks that is returned by the getUsers 
> method, is it just a literal representation of the config (with the 
> core handle, pw,... fields added).

With the config-layout of the LiveUser example5, 
LiveUser_Admin->getUser() returns the following:

array(2) {
    0 => array(8) {
        perm_user_id        => int 1
        auth_user_id        => string(32) 29214857b12575501c5c731353c7217e
        auth_container_name => string(2) DB
        perm_type           => int 0
        handle              => string(4) john
        passwd              => string(32) 098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627b4f6
        last_login          => string(19) 0000-00-00 00:00:00
        is_active           => bool true
    }
    1 => array(8) {
        perm_user_id        => int 2
        auth_user_id        => string(32) 02ec099f2d602cc4968c5267970be132
        auth_container_name => string(2) DB
        perm_type           => int 0
        handle              => string(5) guest
        passwd              => string(32) 084e0343a0486ff05530df6c705c8bb4
        last_login          => string(19) 0000-00-00 00:00:00
        is_active           => bool true
    }
}

Here I try to rename the lastlogin field to last_login.... unfortunately with no success.

> In 0.15 we got a multidimensional array with the sub arrays 
> custom_fields and optional_fields.

I like the new more simple array structure :-)


Regards,
Jens