Bug #79356 [Asn]: FFI:structure/union alignment [ext/ffi/tests/022.phpt] failure

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.php.quality-assurance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=79356&edit=1

 ID:                 79356
 Updated by:         [email protected]
 Reported by:        vibhutisawant18 at gmail dot com
 Summary:            FFI:structure/union alignment
                     [ext/ffi/tests/022.phpt] failure
 Status:             Assigned
 Type:               Bug
 Package:            Testing related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 16.04
 PHP Version:        master-Git-2020-03-09 (Git)
 Assigned To:        dmitry
 Block user comment: N
 Private report:     N

 New Comment:

@nikic: I don't know, but in case GCC supports this, I would prefer to support this as well. 

The proposed fix https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/5256


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2020-03-11 09:11:56] [email protected]

@dmitry: Do you know of some particular case where this is being used?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2020-03-11 09:07:00] [email protected]

I'm not sure, if we should remove support for __attribute__((aligned)) without specified alignment completely. Probably, we should export __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ constant and may be add a warning about dependency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2020-03-09 10:24:04] [email protected]

@dmitry: I would suggest that we remove support for __attribute__((aligned)) without specified alignment, because it is not interoperable. If PHP was combined with a different target architecture than the library we're linking against, the alignment will be incorrect. We should force an explicit specification of the alignment instead. What do you think?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2020-03-09 10:21:18] [email protected]

Okay, I see now. __attribute__((aligned)) is the same as __attribute__((__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__)). I happened to use an -march=sandybridge build, where __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ is 32.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2020-03-09 10:09:21] [email protected]

Something odd is going on here. The test passes for me on 7.4, but fails on master. Adding a bit more debug output I get:

FAIL: sizeof(struct  {char a; uint32_t b __attribute__((aligned));})
Expected: 32
Actual: 64
FAIL: alignof(struct  {char a; uint32_t b __attribute__((aligned));})
Expected: 16
Actual: 32

So I'm seeing a higher size/alignment for some reason.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

    https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=79356


--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=79356&edit=1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.