Re: Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use border="0"
"Muhammed Mamedov" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.smarty.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <009901c3fbbb$1d5287f0$2301a8c0@mm> |
I think that providing extra parameter is nice, if no border parameter is
passed then border will be omitted, but when border="value" is passed it
will be set.
I think that adding ne {xhtml_image} is unecesary and confusign, because
later we may find such XHTML incompliances with other tags.
Regards,
Muhammed Mamedov
turkmenweb.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "messju mohr" <[email protected]>
To: "Rainer Müller" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use border="0"
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:47:14AM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote:
> > Rainer müller schrieb:
> > >Hi,
> > >currently html_image creates an img tag with the attribute border="0".
This
> > >isn't good because in XHTML there is no attribute border for the img
tag.
> > >border should not be used by default and should only be enabled with an
> > >extra param border.
>
> Yes, great. That would break it for everybody who relied on border
> defaulting to "0".
>
>
> My suggestion for another solution involves two things:
>
> - Make html_image handle border=null (that is the null constant for an
> unset value as in php) for an undefined border.
>
> {html_image} will still render border="0"
> but
> {html_image border=null} will omit the border
>
>
> - For convinience we can add a new plugin {xhtml_image} that loads and
> calls {html_image} with all parameters but uses null as default for
> border instead of 0.
>
>
> > >Raim
> > Does nodoby noticed that? Or is there nobody interested in valid html?
> >
> > Raim
>
> --
> Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>
--
Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php