Re: Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use border="0"

P.S: in your replies donot forward messages to my personal e-mail. Just mail
it to the list, I read from there via my e-mail client

----- Original Message -----
From: "messju mohr" <[email protected]>
To: "Muhammed Mamedov" <[email protected]>
Cc: "smarty" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use border="0"


> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:19:15PM +0200, Muhammed Mamedov wrote:
> > I think that providing extra parameter is nice, if no border parameter
is
> > passed then border will be omitted, but when border="value" is passed it
> > will be set.
>
> That not backwards compatible. Currently if the border-attribute is
> omitted it defaults to '... border="0" ...'.
>
> > I think that adding ne {xhtml_image} is unecesary and confusign, because
> > later we may find such XHTML incompliances with other tags.
>
> And what do we do then? Making them xhtml-compliant and eventually
> breaking html-compliance with that?

[MUHAMMED] : In my opinion, if say that we won't have such requests in the
future, then introducing border attribute is the best option.
But if we will (I am afraid we will), then we should imlement a new
xhtml_image (and any other tags with xhtml_tagname in the future).. Or maybe
writing a function which will convert passed content into XHTML....

>
> > Regards,
> > Muhammed Mamedov
> > turkmenweb.com
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "messju mohr" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Rainer Müller" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use
border="0"
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:47:14AM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote:
> > > > Rainer müller schrieb:
> > > > >Hi,
> > > > >currently html_image creates an img tag with the attribute
border="0".
> > This
> > > > >isn't good because in XHTML there is no attribute border for the
img
> > tag.
> > > > >border should not be used by default and should only be enabled
with an
> > > > >extra param border.
> > >
> > > Yes, great. That would break it for everybody who relied on border
> > > defaulting to "0".
> > >
> > >
> > > My suggestion for another solution involves two things:
> > >
> > > - Make html_image handle border=null (that is the null constant for an
> > > unset value as in php) for an undefined border.
> > >
> > > {html_image} will still render border="0"
> > > but
> > > {html_image border=null} will omit the border
> > >
> > >
> > > - For convinience we can add a new plugin {xhtml_image} that loads and
> > > calls {html_image} with all parameters but uses null as default for
> > > border instead of 0.
> > >
> > >
> > > > >Raim
> > > > Does nodoby noticed that? Or is there nobody interested in valid
html?
> > > >
> > > > Raim
> > >
> > > --
> > > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
> > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
> --
> Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

-- 
Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php