Re: tokens as input to modifiers

> --- messju mohr <[email protected]> wrote:
> > i think it's intended. "null" or "true" could be registered
> > functions which makes the above valid syntax. allowing "null" and
> > "true" as constants would make it ambiguous.

Sorry for the multiple emails, but I just had another thought. Where is
the logic in allowing function plugin names that are already used as
tokens within the parser? Particularly for things like "null", "true",
etc ?

xo boots 

-- 
Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php